![]() |
|
The Infrastructure Projects - Printable Version +- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk) +-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Fan Talk - Forest All Over The World (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: The Infrastructure Projects (/showthread.php?tid=23) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
|
RE: The Infrastructure Projects - Salvatore Matrecano - 14-05-2024 (14-05-2024, 07:07 PM)ozzyten10 Wrote: I still think Toton is a red herring. There has been slow take up of the redevelopment plan of Radcliffe on soar. Sustainability keeps being mentioned as does EON. Radcliffe is being demolished in September 2024. Work to decommission Ratcliffe starts in September 24, that’s totally different to demolition. The decommissioning process will take a minimum 2 years before any work on that site can even start. Think there are eyes on the Freeport taking the site too. Regardless its in the middle of nowhere on the outskirts of Leicestershire. No thanks. RE: The Infrastructure Projects - Long John - 14-05-2024 There’s no hot water in the main stand. The facilities are poor. Ok let’s move stadium. “We’re not moving” Everyone is entitled to their opinion but some of the nonsense spouted on social media is ridiculous. If it happens and we do move it will be for progress. Personally I don’t really want to move just for the current location. But the ground is a shambles and facilities are terrible. I like the idea of an owner wanting more and wanting success. It’s taken 5 years not to build a new PT stand yet many consider building a whole new stadium on the current site is the best idea . It’s just not feasible and never will be. Too many hoops to jump through planning wise. Nothings forever. What will the city ground look like in another 20 years if we do stay? Since Iv been alive 3 of the 4 stands have changed, so it’s not the same ground I first went to. There’s no room to make them bigger. It will be a sad day, but surely we have to move to improve. RE: The Infrastructure Projects - ToryTom - 14-05-2024 (14-05-2024, 07:19 PM)Long John Wrote: There’s no hot water in the main stand. #MoveToImprove. I like it. RE: The Infrastructure Projects - DR Forest - 14-05-2024 (14-05-2024, 06:56 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:(14-05-2024, 05:57 PM)Paplane Wrote:(14-05-2024, 03:12 PM)Joe Baker Legend Wrote: Possible other solution... I didn’t know we had so many qualified architects and chartered surveyors on the forum. RE: The Infrastructure Projects - Salvatore Matrecano - 14-05-2024 I don’t have to know anything to know that is a piece of fantasy artwork by someone not remotely connected to the club or the process. Its irrelevant nonsense and not what the club are looking to deliver even if they do stay. Pretty sure Benoy have their own architects. RE: The Infrastructure Projects - BadDog - 14-05-2024 (14-05-2024, 07:19 PM)Long John Wrote: There’s no hot water in the main stand. Pretty much agree with this! RE: The Infrastructure Projects - Paplane - 14-05-2024 (14-05-2024, 08:06 PM)DR Forest Wrote:(14-05-2024, 06:56 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:(14-05-2024, 05:57 PM)Paplane Wrote:(14-05-2024, 03:12 PM)Joe Baker Legend Wrote: Possible other solution... I dabble.... RE: The Infrastructure Projects - DR Forest - 14-05-2024 (14-05-2024, 10:20 PM)Paplane Wrote:(14-05-2024, 08:06 PM)DR Forest Wrote:(14-05-2024, 06:56 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:(14-05-2024, 05:57 PM)Paplane Wrote:(14-05-2024, 03:12 PM)Joe Baker Legend Wrote: Possible other solution... :Hats off: I’m not saying I disagree with either of you, chaps; there was very little substance in the article but as someone who agrees that a 50k stadium is a necessary part of the club’s future, I think every idea should at least be considered fully if it might provide that 50k+ solution at the current site. RE: The Infrastructure Projects - ToryTom - 14-05-2024 (14-05-2024, 11:39 PM)DR Forest Wrote:(14-05-2024, 10:20 PM)Paplane Wrote:(14-05-2024, 08:06 PM)DR Forest Wrote:(14-05-2024, 06:56 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:(14-05-2024, 05:57 PM)Paplane Wrote: What a load of rubbish that is. It's a work of pure fiction. I suspect we have been offered a large site at Toton for not very much. Some are talking as if we are moving to the other side of the country. For plenty of our fans it will be closer than the city ground. If it is going to increase income streams to allow us to compete at the top end of the premier league then surely it is an offer we cannot turn down. The alternative is stay at the city ground. look how hard it has been to just get planning for 5,000 seats in the peter taylor stand. we can make the new stadium iconic and a history. nothing lasts forever. RE: The Infrastructure Projects - Reds73 - 15-05-2024 The reality is we will never be able to make the CG what we really want it to be - a big enough stadium 40-50k with all the amenities on site to generate a lot of cash for 365 days. It’s not just the current fans, it’s also about the legacy for supporters over the next 50 yrs. I would want my young lad who loves Forest to have the opportunity to experience the success I have seen. It’s not right to just make do with half baked improvements. If moving helps sustain our chances of success, then it is the right thing to do for future generations. RE: The Infrastructure Projects - Sniffer Dog (Admin) - 15-05-2024 I am probably talking out of my arse here and I am a bit out of the loop but what about Phoenix Park (A610) and also the Goose Fair site (The Forest)? RE: The Infrastructure Projects - DR Forest - 15-05-2024 (15-05-2024, 12:21 AM)Reds73 Wrote: The reality is we will never be able to make the CG what we really want it to be - a big enough stadium 40-50k with all the amenities on site to generate a lot of cash for 365 days. I agree. Yet to inform those who currently can’t take a step back to see it, I would ask the club and council to show us what ‘the freehold’ on offer is so we/the club can all see together whether it’s feasible or not. How big is the footprint on offer? Is a sideways stadium BS or something the current chairman has swept under the carpet because of a possible conflict of interest? Would the plot allow both a bigger stadium and the leisure facilities required? A Forest hotel? How many and how much profit from apartments and what slice would the council want? Do the numbers add up? Maybe Toton can be the training ground/conference venue nearer the motorway and CG the leisure complex? I guess with the backdrop of tit for tat press statements from club and council, I’m asking for transparency so the fan base can all make a fully informed decision. |