![]() |
|
The Infrastructure Projects - Printable Version +- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk) +-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Fan Talk - Forest All Over The World (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: The Infrastructure Projects (/showthread.php?tid=23) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
|
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - davestretton - 18-06-2019 (18-06-2019, 07:57 PM)Paplane Wrote: I was wondering what was holding the planning application up. I guess it's the negotiations re the lease. Planning application is not due to be submitted until the end of next month, and subject to approval, work will begin next summer RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Sniffer Dog (Admin) - 30-08-2019 All gone a bit quiet on the stadium and surrounding areas redevelopment. Just wondering if anyone can share an update of some sort. RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Tricky - 30-08-2019 (30-08-2019, 08:11 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote: All gone a bit quiet on the stadium and surrounding areas redevelopment. Just wondering if anyone can share an update of some sort. it's my guess that the initial plans have been put to Rushcliffe Council and they are either sitting on them or have returned them wanting more information or wanting certain details removed/added/ elaborated on etc, or they are awaiting reports from the Fire, Police, Environment Agency, Wildlife Trust, Civic Trust etc before they can proceed to the next stage, which would be to publicise the Planning Application RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Deberg - 30-08-2019 If planning has gone in and has been validated then The information would be available via the planning portal. I don’t think it will have been submitted yet as they will most probably be going through process of planning discussions and costing exercise of the current proposals. Just a guess. RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Sniffer Dog (Admin) - 08-09-2019 (18-06-2019, 06:11 PM)Redgirl Wrote: Thank goodness all talk of new site dismissed. Forever on Trent Bridge where we should be. This ^ I never wanted us to relocate either. RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Strawberry Avenger - 10-09-2019 (08-09-2019, 11:42 AM)Sniffer Dog Wrote:(18-06-2019, 06:11 PM)Redgirl Wrote: Thank goodness all talk of new site dismissed. Forever on Trent Bridge where we should be. Amen to that. SA. RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Paplane - 17-09-2019 (18-06-2019, 08:05 PM)davestretton Wrote:(18-06-2019, 07:57 PM)Paplane Wrote: I was wondering what was holding the planning application up. I guess it's the negotiations re the lease. Dave, any more you can say on the progress of the planning app? Surely it's getting tight now for a spring start? There's the planning (12 weeks determination period then likely planning committee(?)), plus prep of tender docs and contractor tendering (or negotiating), plus detailed technical design. RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Sniffer Dog (Admin) - 17-09-2019 Just hope that it is all progressing well and that we haven't hit a stumbling block. RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Salvatore Matrecano - 24-09-2019 Supporter consultation organised in conjunction with Forza with ideas forwarded to club, have your say, Keep it sensible and realistic please. My suggestion is for away fans capacity to increase (which it will have to) by giving them U1 and U2 as well as existing W1 and 2 and X1 . This creates an away corner, meets league requirement for away fans to be next to pitch but maintains Forest fans in LB and behind the goal. Crucially it should satisfy police safety and segregation concerns as all would be in secure area and exit to the coach park as now where they can be contained if necessary. I hope we dont go back to the old way of giving away fans the whole LB, gives them a huge advantage. RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Ciscokid - 24-09-2019 I've asked for better facilities for bikes and for buses to run from the park and ride sites to the CG on match days. Lady Bay bridge is especially dangerous after games and so anything that reduces congestion would help. RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Tricky - 25-09-2019 (24-09-2019, 09:30 AM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: Supporter consultation organised in conjunction with Forza with ideas forwarded to club, have your say, Keep it sensible and realistic please. I would prefer it if we took back ALL of the LB. That stand has amazing acoustics due to the low roof. We should not be giving away teams any advantage by letting their fans sound louder than they actually are. For me, I would give them the 4 sections of the BS stand next to the Bridgford end (upper and lower) with better segregation methods, so that we do not lose too many seats by using the tarpaulin RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Camms - 27-09-2019 I agree with Tricky. We should take back the whole of the Bridgford End. I don't believe all that codswallop that it can't be done for whatever reason, they used to say that the Main Stand couldn't be done also. |