+- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk)
+-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Fan Talk - Forest All Over The World (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: The Infrastructure Projects (/showthread.php?tid=23)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Tricky - 10-01-2020
Two things............
1. Weren't planning rules relaxed a couple of years ago, with right to light being more lenient towards the developer?
2. Lets hope former Father of the House and MP for Rushcliffe, Ken Clarke, who is a Forest fan, still has a lot of influence over his former Tory sidekicks :angel:
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Sniffer Dog (Admin) - 13-01-2020
When this project is finished wouldn't it be better if the new Main Stand was renamed The Brian Clough Stand and The Brian Clough Stand as it is now becomes The Peter Taylor Stand?
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - ThePromisedLand - 13-01-2020
Yep
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Joe Baker Legend - 13-01-2020
(13-01-2020, 09:51 AM)Sniffer Dog Wrote: When this project is finished wouldn't it be better if the new Main Stand was renamed The Brian Clough Stand and The Brian Clough Stand as it is now becomes The Peter Taylor Stand?
I think that would be wrong, why not call it the Clough & Taylor Stand. Then we have a spare for any future hero!
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - optimistic_red - 13-01-2020
Call it the Marinakis stand?!!?
As long as it's not "bet365", "DG Cars", "boots", etc I'll be happy.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Paplane - 13-01-2020
Whats wrong with Taylor getting some glory?
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Sniffer Dog (Admin) - 13-01-2020
(13-01-2020, 09:59 AM)Joe Baker Legend Wrote:(13-01-2020, 09:51 AM)Sniffer Dog Wrote: When this project is finished wouldn't it be better if the new Main Stand was renamed The Brian Clough Stand and The Brian Clough Stand as it is now becomes The Peter Taylor Stand?
I think that would be wrong, why not call it the Clough & Taylor Stand. Then we have a spare for any future hero!
True Joe. What would be wrong is to leave the name as it is now (Peter Taylor Stand).
It needs to change to The Brian Clough Stand or The Clough And Taylor Stand.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Paplane - 13-01-2020
Legends stand?
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Camms - 13-01-2020
(13-01-2020, 10:01 AM)Paplane Wrote: Whats wrong with Taylor getting some glory?
Sniffer did say rename the existing Brian Clough Stand the Peter Taylor Stand.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Alf Garnett - 13-01-2020
(13-01-2020, 09:51 AM)Sniffer Dog Wrote: When this project is finished wouldn't it be better if the new Main Stand was renamed The Brian Clough Stand and The Brian Clough Stand as it is now becomes The Peter Taylor Stand?
Sounds good to me that does.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Paplane - 21-01-2020
I'm keeping my eye on the comments coming in re the planning application. They are posted on the Ruschcliffe BC planning website. There's some more of concern appeared on there now.
1) The Nottingham City Council Highways Dept are trashing the travel assessment. Among a load of technical arguments about traffic movement and parking, they say there's not enough car parking being provided and they don't like the road layout proposed. They also suggest that money off forest be sought to upgrade lady bay bridge for pedestrians.
2) The rowing clubs are objecting saying that the club have pulled out of a memorandum of understanding previously reached. As such they have recently drawn up their own development plans for improvement to the rowing facilities and say the nffc development will restrict them from implementing these. They dont like the flats near their boat clubs and say this will restrict them using the venues for gigs and wedding receptions etc.
3) Rushcliffe Borough Council Community Development Dept are saying The rowing clubs are listed as an 'Asset of Community Value' in a similar way as to which the city ground itself is. If this is to be disposed with then there's an notification process to be gone through and they have not been notified.
4) There are a couple of objections from individuals who use the boat club facilities.
They're really getting down to the issues now with the application.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Widdow - 21-01-2020
I did say ages ago forest stopped talking to the boat clubs