![]() |
|
Player Selection & Formation - Printable Version +- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk) +-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Fan Talk - Forest All Over The World (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Player Selection & Formation (/showthread.php?tid=849) |
RE: Player Selection & Formation - Sabricadabra - 07-11-2020 4231 most of the match. RE: Player Selection & Formation - Strawberry Avenger - 08-11-2020 Guer seemed to be a link man. On the efl it looked like he was dropping off. But close enough to interplay. Best we've had at that role in a long time. SA. RE: Player Selection & Formation - BadDog - 08-11-2020 (07-11-2020, 09:48 PM)Sabricadabra Wrote: 4231 most of the match. No it was 4-4-1-1 RE: Player Selection & Formation - Strawberry Avenger - 08-11-2020 That would explain Guer looking more dropped off. 4-4-1-1 seemed to suit Forest loads. Ch getting time into players legs to build up fitness and some clever rotation. Shuffled his pack well over the games so far. SA. RE: Player Selection & Formation - Sabricadabra - 09-11-2020 (08-11-2020, 10:33 PM)BadDog Wrote:(07-11-2020, 09:48 PM)Sabricadabra Wrote: 4231 most of the match. No it wasn’t. Watch it back and look at the lines. Standard 4231. RE: Player Selection & Formation - optimistic_red - 09-11-2020 (09-11-2020, 07:22 AM)Sabricadabra Wrote:(08-11-2020, 10:33 PM)BadDog Wrote:(07-11-2020, 09:48 PM)Sabricadabra Wrote: 4231 most of the match. There isn't much difference between 4231 and 4411. It's just the position of the wingers. During the game we were in both formations. RE: Player Selection & Formation - Sabricadabra - 11-11-2020 (09-11-2020, 09:51 AM)optimistic_red Wrote:(09-11-2020, 07:22 AM)Sabricadabra Wrote:(08-11-2020, 10:33 PM)BadDog Wrote:(07-11-2020, 09:48 PM)Sabricadabra Wrote: 4231 most of the match. It’s true that they are similar, but for most of the match we set up in a 4-2-3-1. The main difference is the midfield both played holding roles, rather than in a flat four. This began because some were saying we set up in a 4-4-2 with Taylor and Guerrero as a pair, which is wide of the mark. RE: Player Selection & Formation - McDurban - 11-11-2020 (09-11-2020, 09:51 AM)optimistic_red Wrote:(09-11-2020, 07:22 AM)Sabricadabra Wrote:(08-11-2020, 10:33 PM)BadDog Wrote:(07-11-2020, 09:48 PM)Sabricadabra Wrote: 4231 most of the match. I think the positioning of the wings does shift between the two formations during a game. What was different against Wycombe was the role Guerrero was playing, closer to Taylor more of a shadow than a playmaker. RE: Player Selection & Formation - ozzyten10 - 11-11-2020 I personally think 4411 as there is a subtle difference between Guerreros role than say freeman. Guerrero plays with his back to goal and looks to hold and link play quickly- freeman more on the half turn. Just my opinion... RE: Player Selection & Formation - tugger2018 - 11-11-2020 I agree Ozzie and so far gurrero looks the better fit Which surprises me RE: Player Selection & Formation - ThePromisedLand - 12-11-2020 Looking like the EFL are to vote 5 subs back in. Can’t decide whether that’s good or not for us. Deep squad = strong bench = +ve Small squads ( other clubs ) = greater ability to rotate = not so +ve RE: Player Selection & Formation - Shawoddyred - 12-11-2020 (12-11-2020, 02:01 PM)ThePromisedLand Wrote: Looking like the EFL are to vote 5 subs back in. I'd go with positive for us. We do have a couple paper players (I'm looking at you, Sow!), who still manage to have a big impact when they're involved! Means we can get minutes into the legs of returning players easier too if the opportunity arises during a game. Maybe even allow players like Mighten to get more of a look in. |