+- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk)
+-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Fan Talk - Forest All Over The World (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: The Infrastructure Projects (/showthread.php?tid=23)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Salvatore Matrecano - 11-03-2021
(11-03-2021, 04:22 PM)Knocker West Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:17 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: Yep. Leicesters new academy and training ground is 12 miles away from their stadium. Im sure somewhere can be found but any rebuild would be still be a big outlay.
& we'll have to make sure there's enough nettles for the players to run through, or am I being to out of date?
When I look at most of the current squads ability to pass the ball to a teammate 5 yards away I seriously question if running through nettles is the only training they do.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Sniffer Dog (Admin) - 11-03-2021
(11-03-2021, 04:22 PM)ThePromisedLand Wrote: My worry would be that this could push back any Cat 1 application - or am I being overly concerned?
That crossed my mind too TPL.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Paplane - 11-03-2021
(11-03-2021, 04:41 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:22 PM)ThePromisedLand Wrote: My worry would be that this could push back any Cat 1 application - or am I being overly concerned?
That crossed my mind too TPL.
They've applied for CAT 1 status based on the facilities (and proposed facilities) on the current site. I cant imagine they'd just be having a punt at an application to see if they could get CAT1. They must have an inkling that it's possible they'll be successful.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Sniffer Dog (Admin) - 11-03-2021
(11-03-2021, 04:51 PM)Paplane Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:41 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:22 PM)ThePromisedLand Wrote: My worry would be that this could push back any Cat 1 application - or am I being overly concerned?
That crossed my mind too TPL.
They've applied for CAT 1 status based on the facilities (and proposed facilities) on the current site. I cant imagine they'd just be having a punt at an application to see if they could get CAT1. They must have an inkling that it's possible they'll be successful.
That was the conclusion I came to Pap when the original thought crossed my mind.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Tricky - 11-03-2021
(11-03-2021, 04:52 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:51 PM)Paplane Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:41 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:22 PM)ThePromisedLand Wrote: My worry would be that this could push back any Cat 1 application - or am I being overly concerned?
That crossed my mind too TPL.
They've applied for CAT 1 status based on the facilities (and proposed facilities) on the current site. I cant imagine they'd just be having a punt at an application to see if they could get CAT1. They must have an inkling that it's possible they'll be successful.
That was the conclusion I came to Pap when the original thought crossed my mind.
I thought that too! But, surely it is better to get Cat1 ASAP with the facilities already in place, then worry about moving to another site once Cat1 status has been approved? If we move after Cat1 status has been achieved, then it is just a case of providing the same, if not better facilities on the new site in a more permanent and purpose built environment.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Dog and Bear - 13-03-2021
Fingers crossed for the new stand and for a cat 1 academy. If for some reason we don't get one or the other then it won't be for lack of trying.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Jean_claude_killy - 13-03-2021
(11-03-2021, 06:44 PM)Tricky Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:52 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:51 PM)Paplane Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:41 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:22 PM)ThePromisedLand Wrote: My worry would be that this could push back any Cat 1 application - or am I being overly concerned?
That crossed my mind too TPL.
They've applied for CAT 1 status based on the facilities (and proposed facilities) on the current site. I cant imagine they'd just be having a punt at an application to see if they could get CAT1. They must have an inkling that it's possible they'll be successful.
That was the conclusion I came to Pap when the original thought crossed my mind.
I thought that too! But, surely it is better to get Cat1 ASAP with the facilities already in place, then worry about moving to another site once Cat1 status has been approved? If we move after Cat1 status has been achieved, then it is just a case of providing the same, if not better facilities on the new site in a more permanent and purpose built environment.
Club have no option but to go for Cat 1 at the next opportune moment.
The way the application system works, on a three year cycle, means that if they do not apply, they have to wait three years for the next opportunity.
My understanding is that the only bar to gaining Cat 1 status was not having an Education facility at the current site; that is being resolved.
Can you imagine letting the next opportunity slip, we then find a suitable site and end up having to wait two years or 18 Months before we could apply again?
That would be incredibly bad planning.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Tricky - 13-03-2021
(13-03-2021, 11:49 AM)Jean_claude_killy Wrote:(11-03-2021, 06:44 PM)Tricky Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:52 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:51 PM)Paplane Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:41 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote: That crossed my mind too TPL.
They've applied for CAT 1 status based on the facilities (and proposed facilities) on the current site. I cant imagine they'd just be having a punt at an application to see if they could get CAT1. They must have an inkling that it's possible they'll be successful.
That was the conclusion I came to Pap when the original thought crossed my mind.
I thought that too! But, surely it is better to get Cat1 ASAP with the facilities already in place, then worry about moving to another site once Cat1 status has been approved? If we move after Cat1 status has been achieved, then it is just a case of providing the same, if not better facilities on the new site in a more permanent and purpose built environment.
Club have no option but to go for Cat 1 at the next opportune moment.
The way the application system works, on a three year cycle, means that if they do not apply, they have to wait three years for the next opportunity.
My understanding is that the only bar to gaining Cat 1 status was not having an Education facility at the current site; that is being resolved.
Can you imagine letting the next opportunity slip, we then find a suitable site and end up having to wait two years or 18 Months before we could apply again?
That would be incredibly bad planning.
My thoughts entirely JCK
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Salvatore Matrecano - 13-03-2021
(13-03-2021, 11:49 AM)Jean_claude_killy Wrote:(11-03-2021, 06:44 PM)Tricky Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:52 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:51 PM)Paplane Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:41 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote: That crossed my mind too TPL.
They've applied for CAT 1 status based on the facilities (and proposed facilities) on the current site. I cant imagine they'd just be having a punt at an application to see if they could get CAT1. They must have an inkling that it's possible they'll be successful.
That was the conclusion I came to Pap when the original thought crossed my mind.
I thought that too! But, surely it is better to get Cat1 ASAP with the facilities already in place, then worry about moving to another site once Cat1 status has been approved? If we move after Cat1 status has been achieved, then it is just a case of providing the same, if not better facilities on the new site in a more permanent and purpose built environment.
Club have no option but to go for Cat 1 at the next opportune moment.
The way the application system works, on a three year cycle, means that if they do not apply, they have to wait three years for the next opportunity.
My understanding is that the only bar to gaining Cat 1 status was not having an Education facility at the current site; that is being resolved.
Can you imagine letting the next opportunity slip, we then find a suitable site and end up having to wait two years or 18 Months before we could apply again?
That would be incredibly bad planning.
Thats some good info JCK if its just educational facilities lacking but we tick all other boxes then I hope we are in a good position. Would hope we can do a short term fix re the educational side that would meet recruitments
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Strawberry Avenger - 13-03-2021
(13-03-2021, 11:49 AM)Jean_claude_killy Wrote:(11-03-2021, 06:44 PM)Tricky Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:52 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:51 PM)Paplane Wrote:(11-03-2021, 04:41 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote: That crossed my mind too TPL.
They've applied for CAT 1 status based on the facilities (and proposed facilities) on the current site. I cant imagine they'd just be having a punt at an application to see if they could get CAT1. They must have an inkling that it's possible they'll be successful.
That was the conclusion I came to Pap when the original thought crossed my mind.
I thought that too! But, surely it is better to get Cat1 ASAP with the facilities already in place, then worry about moving to another site once Cat1 status has been approved? If we move after Cat1 status has been achieved, then it is just a case of providing the same, if not better facilities on the new site in a more permanent and purpose built environment.
Club have no option but to go for Cat 1 at the next opportune moment.
The way the application system works, on a three year cycle, means that if they do not apply, they have to wait three years for the next opportunity.
My understanding is that the only bar to gaining Cat 1 status was not having an Education facility at the current site; that is being resolved.
Can you imagine letting the next opportunity slip, we then find a suitable site and end up having to wait two years or 18 Months before we could apply again?
That would be incredibly bad planning.
I see. So it's a timescale thing.
Fair enough. Well explained, Claude.
SA.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Sniffer Dog (Admin) - 17-03-2021
Isn't there a meeting due one of these days, might even have been yesterday?
RE: Season 2021/22 The Good The Bad & The Ugly - Widdow - 13-05-2021
The stadium plan was meant to be submitted in ‘the first quarter of 2021’ , we are now May and it still hasn't.
Randall said they were hoping for a summer decision but when he was asked for timeframe it was noticeable, he didn’t commit to work starting in 2022. They don't have a clue when the work will start even if they do get agreement, so not even guaranteed to start next year for the 2022/23 season and it has been suggested it will take 15 months to build.
Lots of people I have spoken to (at club, council, and media) think it will never happen and they just want planning permission to make it more sellable. But I really hope to be proved wrong -
CUE announcement lol