+- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk)
+-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Fan Talk - Forest All Over The World (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: The Infrastructure Projects (/showthread.php?tid=23)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Mcforest - 01-06-2021
It's all good steps as far as i can see. Building for the future COYR
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Sniffer Dog (Admin) - 01-06-2021
So that's Cat 1 Academy and now new revised plans for the new stand both within the space of a week. The doom merchants won't like this.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Sausage Roll - 01-06-2021
(01-06-2021, 02:15 PM)Sniffer Dog Wrote:(01-06-2021, 02:09 PM)Sausage Roll Wrote: Submitting two lots of planning applications is a bit more than just talk.
You are wasting your breath SR.
The doom merchants have taken over the asylum. No new stand, Worrall will be sold, Mighten will be sold, Johnson will be sold, no cat 1 Academy. Taylor's brainwashed them all.
We all want to see it done, and some scepticism is natural. But you don't just submit two lots of detailed planning applications on a whim. It's clearly not just 'all talk.'
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Mcforest - 01-06-2021
Well at least they still have he is going to sell us and recruitment to cling onto
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - JollyLolly - 01-06-2021
I have been looking at the revised plans on line. Forest are looking & pushing for full planning for the stand which means if granted they can start pretty quickly as I believe they have already appointed a main contractor. It appears that the main issue was that it was an initial hybrid application as Forest wanted planning for the adjacent apartments which would help pay for the development when fully sold. This new application/revised submission is now in part for outline planning of the apartments, thereby technically separating the application to enable the ground rebuild to move forward quickly, also they have now reduced the number of flats down from an initial 250 to 170 plus lowered the overall height of the construction.
I see this very much as good news so hopefully the female planning officer in charge at Rushcliffe is a Forest fan and gets on with recommending approval!
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Fumanchew - 01-06-2021
Also looks like we are not forcing the boat clubs to move which I know was a point of outcry (edit) [actually looks like we are still moving one further down the trent] well it looks like from these photos that this Twitter account has pulled from the plans I also haven’t looked through them all yet.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Paplane - 01-06-2021
(01-06-2021, 02:48 PM)JollyLolly Wrote: I have been looking at the revised plans on line. Forest are looking & pushing for full planning for the stand which means if granted they can start pretty quickly as I believe they have already appointed a main contractor. It appears that the main issue was that it was an initial hybrid application as Forest wanted planning for the adjacent apartments which would help pay for the development when fully sold. This new application/revised submission is now in part for outline planning of the apartments, thereby technically separating the application to enable the ground rebuild to move forward quickly, also they have now reduced the number of flats down from an initial 250 to 170 plus lowered the overall height of the construction.
I see this very much as good news so hopefully the female planning officer in charge at Rushcliffe is a Forest fan and gets on with recommending approval!
It's always been structured as a hybrid application. The football club won't build and sell the flats themselves, they'll obtain the outline planning permission for them and sell them on to a developer who will submit a further planning application, and build them out. As you say, the stand will be approved in full allowing a start presumably at the end of this next season.
I've had a quick scan through the drawings too. The stand is predominantly the same although now the club have stated that the shop will be located in the Trent End corner. For some reason the last scheme was always sketchy in that regard. It either hadn't been bottomed out, or maybe the club were trying to keep their options open. I'm still not convinced by the way this corner building relates to the new stand, the trent end stand and the riverside location. It still looks bolted on as an afterthought to me and doesn't respond to the riverside setting. But everyone's got an opinion. I'll give Benoy's the benefit of the doubt.
The flats are much more sensible now. Gone is that ridiculous tower they proposed and it's been replaced by a more modestly sized structure that will relate to the civic centre flats. Much better all round really. The boat clubs look really out of scale so I'm sure the members will be along shortly to stick their oar's in!
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Fumanchew - 01-06-2021
The new single building for the flats does look really nice especially with its sloping height it does compliment the new waterfront apartments really nicely.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Widdow - 01-06-2021
Great the club have put the ball back into the council court and hope this can be approved quickly. Be great to get it all sorted and give me one less thing to moan about.
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Paplane - 01-06-2021
(01-06-2021, 03:50 PM)Widdow Wrote: Great the club have put the ball back into the council court and hope this can be approved quickly. Be great to get it all sorted and give me one less thing to moan about.
You're going to be screwed if the club go out and buy a load of lower league young talent this summer*. :P
*and Mowatt!
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Widdow - 01-06-2021
(01-06-2021, 03:56 PM)Paplane Wrote:(01-06-2021, 03:50 PM)Widdow Wrote: Great the club have put the ball back into the council court and hope this can be approved quickly. Be great to get it all sorted and give me one less thing to moan about.
You're going to be screwed if the club go out and buy a load of lower league young talent this summer*. :P
*and Mowatt!
If that was the case, I would take it as a sign they have been reading all my posts on here.
Lol
RE: The 2 Infrastructure Projects - Tricky - 01-06-2021
Hopefully these revised plans will be sufficient for RBC to approve them and the club can set about getting the construction carried out as soon as possible.
I can't wait to see the old stand pulled down and the new one built with a bigger capacity now