Nottingham Forest - Wolves
We're simply not good enough to play 4v4 in this league. And, we're pretty good at playing on the break. If anything, Wolves played right into our hands by sticking the extra attacker on. The problem was the lack of finishing, not th3 formation.

Its seems of late I'm one of a very few who's prepared to critise Cooper but yesterday I thought he got everything pretty much bang on. He can't stick the ball in the net himself.
Reply
(02-04-2023, 11:55 AM)Paplane Wrote: We're simply not good enough to play 4v4 in this league. And, we're pretty good at playing on the break. If anything, Wolves played right into our hands by sticking the extra attacker on. The problem was the lack of finishing, not th3 formation.

Its seems of late I'm one of a very few who's prepared to critise Cooper but yesterday I thought he got everything pretty much bang on. He can't stick the ball in the net himself.

Obviously not but can anyone tell me what has Surridge done wrong, we know that Surridge is more than capable score scoring goals and yet Cooper doesn't use him, we are struggling to get goals and yet Cooper continues to over look a striker who we all know can put the ball in the back of the net.
Reply
(02-04-2023, 11:41 AM)Madforit Wrote:
(02-04-2023, 12:07 AM)Jacksbadhobbits Wrote:
(01-04-2023, 09:07 PM)wassy04 Wrote:
(01-04-2023, 09:04 PM)Madforit Wrote: We played well and until Cooper bottled it and made those changes, I couldn't really see them getting anything from that game.

I thought it was Cooper's fault too, why didn't he square it to MGW?

Cooper that annoying bloke on the left wing right? 

Yes that Cooper is so rubbish. What did he ever do for us.

We were doing OK until those changes, they never looked like they were
going to score, literally making those changes cost us two points.

So you have no problem with all the chances we missed? Don't think that contributed?
Reply
(02-04-2023, 12:50 PM)wassy04 Wrote:
(02-04-2023, 11:41 AM)Madforit Wrote:
(02-04-2023, 12:07 AM)Jacksbadhobbits Wrote:
(01-04-2023, 09:07 PM)wassy04 Wrote:
(01-04-2023, 09:04 PM)Madforit Wrote: We played well and until Cooper bottled it and made those changes, I couldn't really see them getting anything from that game.

I thought it was Cooper's fault too, why didn't he square it to MGW?

Cooper that annoying bloke on the left wing right? 

Yes that Cooper is so rubbish. What did he ever do for us.

We were doing OK until those changes, they never looked like they were
going to score, literally making those changes cost us two points.

So you have no problem with all the chances we missed? Don't think that contributed?

No it was refreshing to see the amount of chances we created, the balance in midfield was excellent as was the defence, just a pity the decision making when it counted let us down.
Reply
(02-04-2023, 12:06 PM)Madforit Wrote:
(02-04-2023, 11:55 AM)Paplane Wrote: We're simply not good enough to play 4v4 in this league. And, we're pretty good at playing on the break. If anything, Wolves played right into our hands by sticking the extra attacker on. The problem was the lack of finishing, not th3 formation.

Its seems of late I'm one of a very few who's prepared to critise Cooper but yesterday I thought he got everything pretty much bang on. He can't stick the ball in the net himself.

Obviously not but can anyone tell me what has Surridge done wrong, we know that Surridge is more than capable score scoring goals and yet Cooper doesn't use him, we are struggling to get goals and yet Cooper continues to over look a striker who we all know can put the ball in the back of the net.

Haven't a clue mate. He's really affective when he comes on at 70 mins. Dont know what Cooper doesn't like about him.
Reply
(02-04-2023, 03:08 PM)Paplane Wrote:
(02-04-2023, 12:06 PM)Madforit Wrote:
(02-04-2023, 11:55 AM)Paplane Wrote: We're simply not good enough to play 4v4 in this league. And, we're pretty good at playing on the break. If anything, Wolves played right into our hands by sticking the extra attacker on. The problem was the lack of finishing, not th3 formation.

Its seems of late I'm one of a very few who's prepared to critise Cooper but yesterday I thought he got everything pretty much bang on. He can't stick the ball in the net himself.

Obviously not but can anyone tell me what has Surridge done wrong, we know that Surridge is more than capable score scoring goals and yet Cooper doesn't use him, we are struggling to get goals and yet Cooper continues to over look a striker who we all know can put the ball in the back of the net.

Haven't a clue mate. He's really affective when he comes on at 70 mins. Dont know what Cooper doesn't like about him.

Maybe he’s the ‘mole’ ?
Reply
(02-04-2023, 11:55 AM)Paplane Wrote: We're simply not good enough to play 4v4 in this league. And, we're pretty good at playing on the break. If anything, Wolves played right into our hands by sticking the extra attacker on. The problem was the lack of finishing, not th3 formation.

Its seems of late I'm one of a very few who's prepared to critise Cooper but yesterday I thought he got everything pretty much bang on. He can't stick the ball in the net himself.

This /\
Reply
Evidence emerging today that Podence did spit. VAR just too far away and zooming in causes pixilated view, so bit of flob barely visible-think it's s photographer with long lens. Filthy disgusting human.

Regarding game, whilst gutted we didn't fet the points we deserved I am feeling positive going forward. Just wish We had taken one of our chances or alternatively Felipe heads ball away, Neco doesn't dive in and Navas stays on his feet. Any one of those small details and we win.

Wolves fans appear to be having a meltdown at being so crap and in fairness most slating them for continued ill discipline. A few idiots, my favourite being one guy suggesting Jonno should have been given 2nd yellow for simulation for pretending to wipe spit off his face!!!
Reply
(02-04-2023, 04:46 PM)zicorice Wrote: Evidence emerging today that Podence did spit. VAR just too far away and zooming in causes pixilated view, so bit of flob barely visible-think it's s photographer with long lens. Filthy disgusting human.

Regarding game, whilst gutted we didn't fet the points we deserved  I am feeling positive going forward. Just wish We had taken one of our chances or alternatively Felipe heads ball away, Neco doesn't dive in and Navas stays on his feet. Any one of those small details and we win.

Wolves fans appear to be having a meltdown at being so crap and in fairness most slating them for continued ill discipline. A few idiots, my favourite being one guy suggesting Jonno should have been given 2nd yellow for simulation for pretending to wipe spit off his face!!!

At least it was so late in the game to have an impact on the result if he had have been sent off. The video is clear that he motioned to spit, after seeing the replay I'm surprised he wasn't sent off personally. Did they need a slow mo that had saliva in it?!
Reply
(02-04-2023, 07:20 PM)wassy04 Wrote:
(02-04-2023, 04:46 PM)zicorice Wrote: Evidence emerging today that Podence did spit. VAR just too far away and zooming in causes pixilated view, so bit of flob barely visible-think it's s photographer with long lens. Filthy disgusting human.

Regarding game, whilst gutted we didn't fet the points we deserved  I am feeling positive going forward. Just wish We had taken one of our chances or alternatively Felipe heads ball away, Neco doesn't dive in and Navas stays on his feet. Any one of those small details and we win.

Wolves fans appear to be having a meltdown at being so crap and in fairness most slating them for continued ill discipline. A few idiots, my favourite being one guy suggesting Jonno should have been given 2nd yellow for simulation for pretending to wipe spit off his face!!!

At least it was so late in the game to have an impact on the result if he had have been sent off. The video is clear that he motioned to spit, after seeing the replay I'm surprised he wasn't sent off personally. Did they need a slow mo that had saliva in it?!

I think that's exactly whay they were looking for.
Reply


Forum Jump: