I still think its a premature conversation.
There is no doubt we are better run off the field but that was not difficult, I suspect that the members of the forum could have done better running the Club as a Committee than what the previous ownership achieved! I don't think that alone is enough to claim that we are back?
We have made a fantastic number of signings who all "appear" to be a step up in quality in personnel on those that they are replacing. However, we've been here before and a season of challenges in the Championship can rapidly change the views of the fanbase on even the most well liked player.
The facilities have been improved with a lick of paint and aesthetically the City Ground is more welcoming than it has been for a few years, albeit the big screens are possibly the best upgrade we have had in a number of years and that didn't occur under the new owners.
I don't think the communication from the Club is much different to what we have experienced for the past 20 / 30 years. In fact you could argue that the previous owners affiliation to Twitter kept us more up to date with certain aspects of the Club than ever before and after.
On the pitch competitively we are no better placed yet than what has gone before, the true measure of success is surely where we are come May? I am convinced that it will be a step forward from last season but we surely need more than a step forward to be deemed to be back?
There is no doubt we are better run off the field but that was not difficult, I suspect that the members of the forum could have done better running the Club as a Committee than what the previous ownership achieved! I don't think that alone is enough to claim that we are back?
We have made a fantastic number of signings who all "appear" to be a step up in quality in personnel on those that they are replacing. However, we've been here before and a season of challenges in the Championship can rapidly change the views of the fanbase on even the most well liked player.
The facilities have been improved with a lick of paint and aesthetically the City Ground is more welcoming than it has been for a few years, albeit the big screens are possibly the best upgrade we have had in a number of years and that didn't occur under the new owners.
I don't think the communication from the Club is much different to what we have experienced for the past 20 / 30 years. In fact you could argue that the previous owners affiliation to Twitter kept us more up to date with certain aspects of the Club than ever before and after.
On the pitch competitively we are no better placed yet than what has gone before, the true measure of success is surely where we are come May? I am convinced that it will be a step forward from last season but we surely need more than a step forward to be deemed to be back?