Poll: What should we do?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Hughton out
46.15%
30 46.15%
Dane out
1.54%
1 1.54%
Both out
0%
0 0%
Patience
52.31%
34 52.31%
Total 65 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Temperature Check - Week 2
#1
Tree 
Fine fine fine I know everyone's thinking it so I'll just say it, here's your week 2 poll.

Same question, I wonder if it'll stay at 75-25 still.
Reply
#2
Ive just voted for patience. I'll not be visiting this thread again. Fill your boots naysayers.
Reply
#3
Nothing has changed since the Coventry game, so it's OUT from me :D
Reply
#4
Im Houghton out , his style of football is not my cup of tea poor team selection after a good performance Wednesday from some young players .
Reply
#5
Technically we are still in week 1, ok it's been a long week but even now it's still only 6 days 22 hours and around 41 minutes in, how can we talk about 'patience' let alone vote for it, in effect twice in a week, surely there is fundamental flaw in what patience is actually about

i'd argue for much longer than a week, no not that, i mean the match set up has been identical for more than the last 90 games, generally failing since around 65 games ago as in low goals, no goals, points hunger

Even so, ironically, the nullification emphasis template works, went 1 nil up against Cov, equalised against Bournemouth, then conceded then had 30 mins against 10 men, we were in both games, but when you have the edge like first half v Cov, last 30 v Bournemouth then are the times to gamble, exploitation time, because the opportunities weren't seized upon, the only nullification is of our own game, even so nullification does work but not always in a good way

thank you for your patience
Reply
#6
(15-08-2021, 01:45 PM)Redreg Wrote: Im Houghton out , his style of football is not my cup of tea poor team selection after a good performance Wednesday from some young players .

But his 'style of football' (with some good youth prospects) was good on Wednesday?

SA.
Reply
#7
the big problem is who would be a good replacement and the timing is horrendous

i'd be happy with Paul Hart or happy in that he wouldn't be expensive and would almost certainly want this gig and knows anyone and everyone in the lower leagues and lots of other experience and a connection back to Cloughie, the shrewd choice imo, could possibly bring Cohen with him

also Nigel, maybe Woany might like to step up for full responsibility

personally i'm not to fussed about 'big' names prefer well grounded, lived and breathed football for the last few decades types but slightly under the radar
Reply
#8
(15-08-2021, 03:25 PM)PsychoStanleyStone Wrote: the big problem is who would be a good replacement and the timing is horrendous

i'd be happy with Paul Hart or happy in that he wouldn't be expensive and would almost certainly want this gig and knows anyone and everyone in the lower leagues and lots of other experience and a connection back to Cloughie, the shrewd choice imo, could possibly bring Cohen with him

also Nigel, maybe Woany might like to step up for full responsibility

personally i'm not to fussed about 'big' names prefer well grounded, lived and breathed football for the last few decades types but slightly under the radar

I like your romance, brother Psycho.  And you and me were certainly of the same beating heart Re: the treatment of Martin O' Neil.

We've done all the 'old boys' routines. Hart ('Who we didn't deserve.' according to Clough. I'd have happily followed Paul Hart to the 4th Division playing the way he did.) Martin. Keane. Clark. Psycho. (What happened to all of those, eh?)

'Good players win you games.' Clough.

Tell me.  How many top Championship players do Forest currently have? (I'll spot you the 1st one. 'Zinc Man.')

SA.
Reply
#9
Bring back chris cohen to do the job.
Reply
#10
(15-08-2021, 05:50 PM)Uwantlee Wrote: Bring back chris cohen to do the job.

Don't do this please
Reply
#11
52%-48%? Where have I heard that before ?
Reply
#12
What a difference a week makes
Reply


Forum Jump: